|
Rx Track those pills
The Telegraph, Calcutta, November 07, 2011
A proposal to
introduce prescription audits to curb the excessive use of
antibiotics is hanging fire. Hemchhaya De finds out why
Have you ever
felt that your doctor is prone to prescribing antibiotics
at the drop of a hat? Well, if the National Antibiotic
Policy comes into force, your doctor and thousands of
other medical practitioners would probably become less
indiscriminate in prescribing these drugs for relatively
minor ailments. The problem, however, is that various
pharmaceutical lobbies are fighting tooth and nail to
block this initiative to curb the overuse of antibiotics.
Earlier this
year, the Indian health ministry and various regulatory
bodies under it announced the ambitious National
Antibiotic Policy that recomends, among other things, the
introduction of prescription audit to monitor and restrict
the use of antibiotics. This means that doctors have to
write two prescriptions for antibiotics — one for the
patients and another which may be retained by pharmacists
or chemists for audit by the Drug Controller General of
India or state drug controllers. Any violation would draw
a hefty fine or imprisonment.
However, the
recommendations are being vigorously opposed by the All
India Organisation of Chemists and Druggists (AIOCD), a
powerful body that is believed to control a major part of
the pharmaceutical trade in India. The organisation also
called for a nationwide strike recently to protest against
prescription audit.
It’s no secret
that antibiotic resistance is a growing menace in India
and their excessive use is contributing to the problem. A
recent study in the Indian Journal of Medical Research
prepared by the Global Antibiotic Resistance Partnership (GARP)
— India Working Group shows that between 2005 and 2009,
the units of antibiotics sold across the country went up
by about 40 per cent. The study says that antibiotics are
often prescribed in “irrational ways” in India. “It is
estimated that 20-50 per cent of all antibiotics use are
inappropriate, resulting in an increased risk of adverse
side effects, higher costs of therapy and higher rate of
antimicrobial (antibiotic) resistance,” states the
National Antibiotic Policy.
“Resistance is
driven by antibiotic use, and antibiotic overuse enhances
it. In India we see many instances of such overuse,” says
Dr Ramanan Laxminarayan, director of the Center for
Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy and vice-president,
research and policy, at the Public Health Foundation of
India.
Consumer
activists in the country have long been demanding
prescription audit – a measure that exists in several
Western countries like the US and the UK. Says Rijit
Sengupta, associate director, CUTS International, a body
which fights for pro-consumer policies in the health
sector, “CUTS did a study on drug prescription practices
in India as early as 1995. The study, conducted in West
Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Gujarat
and Tamil Nadu, revealed that there was a gross tendency
to prescribe useless medicines and a dire need for
prescription audit.”
Another study
conducted by CUTS this year in Assam and Chattisgarh threw
up similar results. “The report recommends the need for
closer monitoring of doctor’s behaviour at the micro level
and reiterates the need for prescription audit — not only
for antibiotics, but for all drugs,” adds Sengupta.
Yet, despite
ample evidence of antibiotic overuse and the resultant
health hazards, the government seems to be dragging its
feet on implementing the National Antibiotic Policy. In
fact, P.K. Singh, general secretary, AIOCD, which
petitioned more than 200 members of Parliament against the
audit recommendation, claims, “We have come to know that
the government has put on hold the proposed audit.” AIOCD
maintains that the measure would inconvenience consumers,
particularly from the poorer sections of society. “How can
you expect poor people in remote areas to provide us with
prescriptions when they have no access to doctors,” he
asks.
While the
health ministry denies shelving the National Antibiotic
Policy, the government is said to be taking a relook at
it.
Health and
consumer activists in favour of prescription audit are
planning to intensify their campaign. They say that the
need for prescription audit cannot be overemphasised,
especially when collusive medical practices are the order
of the day in India. “If the government has backtracked on
prescription audit, it’s unfortunate,” says Sengupta. “The
reason cited against such audits — that stringent measures
to regulate antibiotic use might jeopardise the
availability of such medicines among the poor — sounds
juvenile. Why can’t the government improve its process of
drug procurement and distribution to enable better
access,” he asks.
But some
caution against oversimplifying the issue. “We have a dual
problem in India – the lack of access to effective
antibiotics in rural areas and the overuse of powerful
antibiotics in urban centres,” says Dr Laxminarayan. He
says that measures like prescription audit could be useful
in curbing overuse and misuse in cities. “In rural areas,
though, we should focus less on prescriptions and more on
providing effective, affordable antibiotics through
trained healthcare workers and other avenues,” he says.
Medical
experts admit that doctors do tend to prescribe medicines
unnecessarily. “It’s a fact that some doctors abuse
antibiotics — they prescribe drugs even when these are not
needed,” says Dr Bhaskar Narayan Chaudhuri, consultant
microbiologist, Fortis Hospital, Calcutta. “So
prescription audit could be a kind of deterrent for them.”
Others point
out that an effective system of prescription auditing
could also save consumers from the depredations of quacks.
“The biggest threat is posed by quacks who have no
authority whatsoever to prescribe medicines,” says Dr B.B.
Thakur, a senior official with the Association of
Physicians of India, a professional body of about 15,000
consultant physicians. “So audit is necessary to deal with
quacks as well.”
Dr Thakur
reveals that the Medical Council of India has strict rules
against irrational antibiotic use. The Code of Medical
Ethics Regulations 2002, states: “Every physician should,
as far as possible, prescribe drugs with generic names and
he/she shall ensure that there is a rational prescription
and use of drugs.” But of course, these rules are hardly
enforced, he admits.
Some doctors
argue that their fraternity is not to be blamed alone.
“Often patients insist on being prescribed antibiotics for
minor ailments,” says Dr Chaudhuri. “We find it very
difficult to explain to them that they don’t need
antibiotics for aliments like viral fever!”
That said, it
is always the consumer who is at the receiving end of the
overuse and misuse of drugs by medical practitioners. One
can only hope that the government will stand firm on
prescription audit and introduce the measure at the
earliest.
This news item
can also be viewed at:
http://telegraphindia.com/
|