|
Experts
Say No to Data Exclusivity of Pharma Patents
New
Delhi, September 08, 2006
|
“The
pharmaceutical industry and the health delivery
system including the hospitals, doctors,
pharmacists and the diagnostic laboratories need a
coordinated framework of regulation. At present
there is some regulation only to regulate the
pharmaceutical industry while the other components
remain more or less unregulated” This is the view
that emerged from a national workshop organized at
IIC, New Delhi by CUTS International, a
Jaipur-based research and advocacy group, along
with the World Health Organisation and the
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government
of India today.
The
workshop was essentially to share the findings of
a study by CUTS, titled, “Options for Using
Competition Law/Policy Tools in Dealing with
Anti-competitive Practices in Pharmaceuticals and
the Health Delivery System”, also supported by the
World Health Organisation and the Ministry of
Health and Family Welfare. The Workshop saw a
gathering of health and competition experts, as
well as from the academia, consumer and other NGO
activists and representatives of business
associations.
Presenting the report of the study, Nitya Nanda of
CUTS, the Principal Investigator of the study
emphasized that the pharmaceutical and health
delivery system is a peculiar case of market
failure as consumers are not the decision makers.
It is for the doctors to decide the kind of
treatment as well as the medicines, diagnostic
testing etc., and they in collusion with the
pharmaceutical companies and other players in the
market, ignore the interest of the consumers to
fulfill their own interests.
On the
issue of data exclusivity, which is being widely
debated now, the participants including the
Executive Director of Indian Drug Manufacturers
Association, Gajanan Wakankar agreed that India
need not and should not have this.
Referring to the prevailing anti-competitive
practices and the alleged ineffectiveness of the
MRTP Commission in dealing with them, G R Bhatia,
the Additional Director General of the Competition
Commission of India, argued that the MRTP Act did
have some weaknesses, but the new Competition Act
is much improved and hence better effectiveness
can be expected as and when it is implemented.
Ujjwal
Kumar, a WHO National Consultant with the Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare emphasized that some
IPR related provisions in the Competition Act
should be strengthened, and the Competition
Commission should have a role in dealing with
issues like compulsory licensing. Mira Shiva of
the Voluntary Health Association of India
emphasized the need for better education among the
people on health issues.
The
participants also agreed that though it may not be
desirable to put all medicines under price
control, prices of all medicines should be
monitored.
Archives |