|
Pan-African
Network for Promoting Competition and Consumer Welfare Launched:
Mauritius
to have a competition law in 2007, says Minister
Mauritius, March 30, 2007
|
Participants from over a dozen countries of
sub-Saharan Africa agreed to launch the
“Pan-African Network for Promoting Competition and
Consumer Welfare” here today.
A resolution to this effect was adopted at a 2-day
international conference on the subject held in
Mauritius. The conference entitled, “Competition
Policy, Private Sector Development and Poverty
Reduction in Africa” was organised by CUTS
International and the Ministry of Industry, SMEs,
Commerce & Cooperatives of Mauritius with the
support of the Department for International
Development (DFID), UK and the Norwegian Agency
for Development Cooperation (NORAD), Norway.
Speaking at the formal opening of the conference,
Rajeshwar Jeetah, Minister of Industry, SMEs,
Commerce & Cooperatives conveyed that the
Mauritian government was committed towards
adoption of the country’s new Competition Law in
2007. “Promoting democracy is at the heart of the
government’s policy, and the government strongly
believes that the competition law would promote
economic democracy in the country”, he affirmed.
He reiterated the keen interest that the Mauritian
Prime Minister has, for the law to be in place at
the earliest.
The conference deliberated on the progress of a
regional project on competition policy referred to
as the 7Up3 project that CUTS has been engaged
with implementing over the last two years in seven
countries of eastern and southern Africa:
Botswana, Ethiopia, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique,
Namibia and Uganda.
Pradeep S Mehta, Secretary General of CUTS
International underscored that research findings
of the 7Up3 project strongly suggest that project
countries, and indeed others from the developing
world should tailor their competition laws in
accordance with prevailing
socio-economic-political realities, rather than
blindly following industrialised country models of
competition regime evolution and administration.
“For small countries with resource constraints, it
will be useful to explore hybrid laws or hybrid
regulators, like in Peru. Mauritius with a total
population of 1.2mn is a case in point”, said
Mehta. “It would not be advisable for small
countries to have many laws to be administered by
different regulators”.
During the ensuing discussions, a consensus
emerged that for small economies like Mauritius,
Malawi, etc. there was a need to explore the
possibility of a hybrid law integrating
competition, consumer protection and utility
regulation.
“There is a strong correlation between the
efficiency of competition enforcement and growth
and therefore reduction in poverty”, observed
Roger Nellist of the Investment Climate Team,
DFID, UK. He brought to fore evidences that showed
how economies have benefited through an efficient
process of competition enforcement.
Practitioners like Peter M Njoroge, Chairman of
the Monopolies & Prices Commission, Kenya; Douglas
Reissner, Member, Competition Commission of
Namibia and experts like S Chakravarthy, former
Member of India’s Monopolies & Restrictive Trade
Practices Commission of India stressed on the
imperative of adopting and implementing effective
competition regimes in the region to reap the
benefits of privatisation and liberalisation and
curb their negative effects.
A need was felt to garner wider support and
motivation for pushing national governments to
adopt and effectively implement competition
regimes in the region. In response, there was a
consensus to develop a network of individuals and
organisations interested to pursue the cause of
competition reforms and consumer welfare in
Africa. As a result, the “Pan-African Network for
Promoting Competition and Consumer Welfare” was
launched, with International Network of CSOs on
Competition (INCSOC) being its Secretariat.
PANPROC, as this network was referred to would be
a platform to share knowledge and understanding on
competition matters and to demonstrate the
benefits of a healthy competition regime to the
wider public and policy-makers in the region. A
Steering Committee of this network would be
developed, along with a 5-year work-plan for
members to take forward by among other means,
linking it with other networks and facilities on
socio-economic policy aspects.
The momentum gained through the implementation of
the 7Up3 project and demonstrating the benefits of
competition to multiple stakeholders in the region
would be sustained through national-level
workshops to be held in each of the 7Up3 project
countries on competition policy and law over a
period of the next nine months.
‘Competition Toolkits’ individually tailored for
competition administrators and other stakeholders
in each country will be prepared to move forward
in the right direction to implement competition
regimes.
Archives |