|
|
Tariff troubles
The Hindu, April 25, 2009
|
Chennai: In a chapter titled ‘Regulatory
challenges in electricity markets in India,’
Devendra G. Kodwani observes that delivering
competition in retail (low voltage supply to
domestic and other consumers) requires major
developments in meter reading capabilities of
distributors in addition to first having all
connections metered with uniform metering
technology. “This has been achieved in England and
Wales where consumers can easily switch from one
distributor to another at no extra transaction
costs.”
Exploring the question whether tariffs can mimic
competitive rates, the author notes that the
tariff determination process spans over months of
petition submissions, information exchange,
analysis, negotiations, hearings, and decision
making, involving also stakeholder comments,
objections, expectations of consumers on tariff
adjustments.
Each
tariff order usually runs into about 175-200
pages, he frets. “There is item-wise comment and
querying on the justification of projected
expenses, forecast capital expenditure and other
assumptions that the licensee has used in the
projections for next year. The exercise appears
almost like a budget approval of a government
department.”
Tricky
issues of asset base require judgment on the
purchase and replacement costs, depreciation
rates, and cost of capital, Kodwani finds. In some
cases, “Publicly-owned distribution companies do
not provide timely and adequate information,
practically sabotaging the regulatory process, and
ERCs (Electricity Regulatory Commissions) can do
little other than extend the deadlines.”
Another chapter in ‘Politics Triumphs
Economics?’ edited by Pradeep S. Mehta and
Simon J. Evenett (www.academicfoundation.com)
studies concession contracts in Latin America and
finds that regulatory efforts in the matter of
infrastructure seem to be ‘more closely associated
with keeping tariffs as low as possible for
current consumers, than keeping profitability
well-aligned with hurdle rates of return.’
While
regulation is in itself an economic and technical
concept, the fact that the regulated services –
such as water, transport, and energy – are
essential and very visible, it is unavoidable that
politics can interfere with the implementation of
good regulation, the essay’s authors Luis Andres,
Jose Luis Guasch and Stephane Straub concede.
“Using tariff setting for political gains is often
too tempting, particularly around election time.”
This news item can also be viewed at:
http://www.hindu.com/
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/
Archives
|