|
Competition enforcement weak
Business Daily, May 03, 2011 |
By
Rijit Sengupta
Unprecedented interest
and zeal on competition law issues has been noted in African
countries over the last decade or so.
A number of countries
have adopted laws and some have also established a competition
enforcement agency.
However, when it comes
to competition enforcement, most African countries still have a
long way to go.
A competition
enforcement agency’s task is to ensure that markets function in a
fair manner - ensuring predictability and stimulating enterprise
development on one hand, and on the other promoting consumers’
interests.
Both these outcomes
are extremely important from a socio-economic perspective of a
country, but are also marred with interference by vested interest
groups.
Establishment of
socio-economic harmony (in sections of the economy and the
population) as expected from effective enforcement of a
competition law often goes against the ill conceived notions of
such groups.
In order to neutralise
or at least minimise the influence of these interest groups, it is
important that benefits from competition reforms is communicated
to possible ‘friends of competition’ in simple and tangible terms,
so that supporters of the competition reforms process outnumber
and overpower its detractors.
This was one of the
motivations for setting up the Africa Competition Forum (ACF) by a
group of competition experts, practitioners, international
organisations and donors with field-experience on competition
research and enforcement across Africa.
Various networks and
groups have cropped up at the international level to discuss
competition issues.
There was nothing
exclusively dedicated to discussing competition issues pertaining
to Africa.
A rough work-plan was
developed at a Stakeholders’ Meeting of ACF held in March 2010 in
Nairobi and an Interim Steering Committee established.
A first activity was a
‘Needs Assessment’ exercise to assess real needs of competition
agencies (and government departments handling competition issues)
across Africa, for developing an ‘Action Programme’ of the ACF.
Findings from this
needs assessment exercise were shared with a large community of
competition experts at the First Conference of the ACF held in
March 2011 once again in Nairobi.
The needs assessment
report indicated that assistance required by African agencies can
be predominantly segregated into the following: Strategic planning
and management; practical aspects of competition law enforcement
such as investigative and litigation skills and techniques;
foundational training on the basics of competition law and
economics; technical assistance in drafting competition policy,
laws and regulations and in designing agency procedures,
guidelines, and operational manuals; and advocacy and engagement
with other stakeholders.
While it is important
to hone skills of the competition authority staff to be able to
undertake competition assessment independently and investigate
cases, it is imperative to lay an equal emphasis on the need for
engaging and educating other stakeholders (those who are outside
the immediate world of the competition enforcement regime in a
country).
Options identified
above for improving competition enforcement skills are far more
expensive and cannot be afforded by most African countries in the
absence of external financial support.
Government-supported
programmes for sensitising the stakeholders (particularly finance
and planning ministries, audit agencies, procurement offices etc.)
about benefits from an effectively enforced competition regime
would enable winning ‘friends of competition’, who would demand
for expediting and supporting competition reforms processes from
within the countries.
Rijit Sengupta
Associate director, CUTS International
This article can also be viewed at:
http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/
Archives